Which
Translation Should You Trust?
A
Defense Of The Authorized King James Version Of 1611
Introduction
and
Chapter I
by
Timothy S. Morton
Copyright
© 1993, Timothy S.
Morton, All Rights Reserved
All Scripture references and quotations (except where indicated) are
from the
Authorized
King James Bible
INTRODUCTION
In days past purchasing a Bible was
simple. All a person had to do was go to a store that sold them, find
one the size he wanted and with a cover he liked, and pay for it; he
then had his own copy of the word of God. The buyer did not have to
choose which version he wanted because for all practical purposes only
one was available—the Authorized King James Version of 1611. In those
days when a person said "Bible" everyone knew he was referring to the
King James Version. Today, however, this simple task has become much
more complicated. In the last one hundred years (especially the last
thirty), publishers have bombarded Christians with dozens of new
translations, each claiming to be superior to the King James Version.
All of these new "Bibles" on the market leave many Christians
(especially new converts) in a dilemma. They do not know which one to
get. They want to get the best one or the right one, but which is it? A
conversation between a new Christian and a salesman in a modern
Christian bookstore could go like the following:
"Can I help you sir?"
"Yes, I have recently gotten saved
and
would like to buy a Bible."
"Very well sir. We have just
received
another shipment of one of the newest translations, The New
International Version. It is highly recommended by Bible scholars the
world over. It is translated from the oldest and best Hebrew and Greek
texts and is much more accurate than the older versions." He hands him
one.
The Christian opens it, reads a few
lines, and thinks to himself: "This doesn't read like the Bible I was
led to Christ with."
The salesman continues, "Also, we
have
The New American Standard Version which many claim to be the most
accurate, and we still have the old American Standard Version which
some prefer."
The salesman turns and points to
the
shelves full of Bibles behind him and continues, "Here is The New
Revised Standard Version which is recommended by many of the leading
denominations. It's a recent revision of the old Revised Standard
Version which is still popular. Plus, we have The New Century Version,
The Good News Bible, The Living Bible, The Amplified Bible, The New
King James Version, The New English Bible, The New American Bible, The
New Jerusalem Bible and also Phillip's, Weymouth's, Goodspeed's, and
Moffat's New Testament translations. In addition, we have special study
Bibles by Scofield, Dake, Bullinger, Thompson, Rice, Zodhiates,
Willmington, Ryrie, and others which help explain the intent of the
original languages."
The Christian looks at the mass of
Bibles and is bewildered. He finally says: "Do you have a Bible that
says: "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved?"' He
emphasizes "thou shalt."
The man replies: "Well sir, you
must
be referring to the OLD King James Version. It was a good translation
in its day, but it contains several errors; it also has many archaic
words in it that are hard to understand. This has all been corrected in
these new versions. For serious Bible study we recommend one of the new
versions, but if you want the old King James we do have it."
The Christian thinks, "I did not
realize there were so many different Bibles; I always thought there was
only one. How can I know which one of these is the best? Can they all
be the word of God if they are different? Is the King James Version I
was led to Christ with plagued with errors? I don't know what to do."
He flips through the pages of the NIV the salesman showed him first and
says: "Well, if the old King James is not the best...I guess I will
take one of these others...."
Scenes similar to this happen
hundreds
of times every year. They occur not only in bookstores, but also in
homes, places of work, and even in churches. The desire for
God's word has led many Christians into a complex maze of advertising,
salesmanship, scholarship, and opinion which often leaves them
confused. Confusion is a state God is not the author of (I Corinthians
14:33). He wants every believer to have His pure word and KNOW he has
it!
In most churches in America there
is
no written, final authority-no Bible which is the absolute, FINAL
authority for ALL matters of faith and practice. Because of this, one
may see a wide variety of Bible versions brought by the members of
these churches to a service. Some may bring an NIV to read while others
bring an ASV or NASV Still others may prefer the NEB RSV, NCV, NKJV, or
any other version as their "favorite" translation. And as if this is
not enough "diversity," during the service they may hear the pastor
appeal to yet another translation (maybe even his OWN). Some ministers
use several different versions in a single message. What a recipe for
confusion! All of these versions conflict with each other in thousands
of places, and compared with the King James, many of the differences
affect MAJOR DOCTRINES. This flood of modern, contradicting
"translations" has made it so that the average Christian today has no
standard Bible to consult as his final authority. All he has is a
"reliable" translation which he "PREFERS," but he does not even prefer
it in every passage. One person may prefer version A in one passage and
version B in another, while another will prefer just the opposite! What
a tragedy. Has the word of God become subject to the whimsical
preferences of wordly, carnal, egocentric Christians? Many treat it as
if it has.
Is it God's will that the Christian
world be flooded with so many different English translations? If not,
how can a person know which one is the infallible word of God? How can
he know which version (or versions) is God's pure word; the one which
contains the very words God wants him to have? These very questions
puzzled the author until God opened his eyes to the truth of the
matter. This book is an attempt to help others who may be in the same
dilemma. Our purpose is not to give the many evidences that indicate
God wrote a Bible (there are many good books on this subject), but to
deal with the more relevant matter: does this Bible exist in pure form
TODAY? Before we go any farther let the reader understand, God's pure,
inerrant, infallible word IS ON THIS EARTH and He wants YOU to have it
(Psalm 119:130)!
CHAPTER
I
WHY
ALL THE CONFUSION?
The issues concerning the Bible,
its
authority, origin, reliability, passage through history, and present
form are issues man has debated for millennia. Nearly every person in
history who thought himself knowledgeable had a definite opinion about
the word of God and these many opinions varied greatly. Of those who
professed "religion," some thought "God's word" was not made up of
words at all but of only general ideas or concepts. Others claimed God
did speak words to man, but insisted His words were mixed with "Jewish
fables" or otherwise corrupted and "The Church" must sort them out for
him. Still others believed His words were originally "given by
inspiration" and written down, but since then they have been "lost"
because the original manuscripts have not survived the centuries and
errors have crept into their copies making them imperfect. And then
there were those who believed they had the very words and every word
God wanted them to have. Each of these beliefs is represented today,
but which one is right? They can't all be. Furthermore, what brought
about these conflicting ideas to start with? Where can one look to find
the truth? For the answer, why not consider the book the Lord Jesus
Christ read (Luke 4:17), studied (Luke 4:16) taught from (Luke 24:27),
commanded others to study (John 5:39), and the words He said would
never pass away (Matthew 24:35).the Holy Bible?
What
Saith The Scriptures?
To find what the scriptures say
about
these matters one does not have to go more than three chapters into the
book of Genesis. It is not by accident the subject of God's word and
how it is treated by different individuals is found at the very
beginning of the scriptures. God wants man to learn before he reads in
them any farther that there are forces at work who question His word
and attempt to corrupt it. This is clearly seen in Genesis chapters two
and three where God is found speaking WORDS to man (2:16), man hears
these words spoken (2:16-17), and then someone QUESTIONS whether God
really said them (3:1)! Here we are introduced to the first Bible
revisor. Satan (Revelation 12:9). Clearly he has great interest in the
what God says, not because he loves His words, but because he knows
they are the words of life (John 6:63)—the words that deliver captives
from his kingdom (1 Peter 1:23).
In Genesis 2:17 God was warning
Adam
of a danger in the garden which he could not have discovered himself
until it was too late, that is, DEATH. God did not want Adam dead, but
Satan did, and Satan knew he would have to destroy Adam's, or at least
Eve's, confidence in God's word to bring his death about. The method he
used to do this worked very well for him, thus he still uses it today;
He simply QUESTIONS whether God actually said what He said (Genesis 3:1
"Yea hath God said"). His questioning led Eve to SUBTRACT from God's
word, therefore corrupting it (Genesis 3:2, "freely" is subtracted, see
2:16), and it also led her to ADD to His word, further corrupting it
(Genesis 3:3, "neither shall ye touch it").
Once Satan has a person doubting
God's
word, he has him making himself the final authority for his life
instead of God ("ye shall be as gods"). Casting doubt is the Devil's
specialty. He knows that every lost person he can keep in doubt
concerning the Bible will not be saved, and that every saved person he
can get to doubt or question it in some area will not fully be what God
wants him to be. He easily persuades millions in this manner to trust
their own opinion over God's. It is imperative we remember this. The
powers behind all the doubt and confusion we have today concerning the
word of God are much more powerful than the powers of Madison Avenue or
of mere book publishers; they are "spiritual" powers in "high places"
which are motivated by "wickedness" (Ephesians 6:12). The Serpent's
behavior in Eden proves the realm of God's word is Satan's primary
interest. His foremost objective is to question, dilute, deny, corrupt,
or mock God's word in the mind of every person so that person will not
learn any of the precious truths found in it. If he had his way there
would be no pure word of God anywhere on earth, but, praise His name,
the God of Heaven, who is infinitely more powerful than Satan, has
promised to preserve His word for all generations.
Another thing one must remember
about
Satan is that he counterfeits or imitates nearly everything God does.
He has his own apostles (2 Corinthians 11:13-15), prophets (2 Peter
2:1), messiah (John 5:43), trinity (Revelation 13), bride (Revelation
17), as well as his own Bibles. Something many people seem to forget
is, if all translations of the Bible are the word of God as many claim,
then where are the Devil's? Did he lose interest in the word since
Genesis 3? Has he quit corrupting it (2 Corinthians 2:17)? Is he afraid
to influence revision committees? No, on all three counts. The Devil
will be attempting to corrupt the word of God until the day he is cast
into the lake of fire.
Is
It A Matter Of Opinion?
The subtility of Satan is clearly
seen
in the way he has affected the mentality of Christians in this century.
He has convinced millions there is no infallible Bible on earth today
by insisting only the original manuscripts were "given by inspiration."
To get them to swallow this fallacy, first he reminds them that all the
Greek and Hebrew manuscripts which still exist are only copies, and
then he insists they therefore must contain errors, making them
inferior to the originals. This explains why many scholars speak the
way they do in their books and commentaries. They say things like: "The
most ancient and reliable texts tell us..." or "The oldest and best
texts read...." Why can't they say: "The infallible Bible says..." or
"The pure word of God tells us..." and produce their authority? They
can't because they do not have a pure and infallible Bible. The only
"Bible" these "experts" have is a collection of what they call
"reliable manuscripts" (which according to them can only be uninspired
copies), and their reliability is based solely upon the "whim and
fancy" of each individual's opinion. This leaves them with no final
authority at all except their OPINION of what they THINK the originals
USED to say! They will not hesitate, however, to "correct" the King
James Version every time this authority (opinion) tells them to.
The Devil is playing an
intellectual
trick on scholars. He uses false logic and reasoning (like he did with
Eve) to assure them that since the original manuscripts no longer exist
the inspiration they were given by no longer exists either. That is,
God's inerrant word vanished with the autographs. If one follows this
reasoning, it would be IMPOSSIBLE for anyone in any language to have a
pure, infallible Bible. Since all existing manuscripts are copies, and
"copies cannot be inspired," no person anywhere could read (or hear)
God's pure word. "Yea hath God said." Satan has not changed his tactics
in six thousand years. He got Eve to doubt God by convincing her that
HER OPINION of the tree was of MORE VALUE than God's, and he gets
Christians today to doubt Him by telling them that since the
"originals" are gone, they must TRUST the OPINIONS of scholars to
provide them with a Bible that is "reliable," but by no means inerrant.
Satan learned very early that man values his opinion above nearly
everything else, and he will not hesitate to use this egoism against
him.
In view of this, it is interesting
to
observe that when most fundamentalist preachers preach about the Bible
they insist it IS inspired, infallible, inerrant, the perfect word of
God, etc., and wave the Bible they are using (usually a KJV) as though
they are referring to it. However, when questioning them closely one
will find they actually believe the opposite. Like their mentors above,
they do not believe ANY translation is perfect or inerrant and talk
like it is impossible for one to be. When forced to say what they mean
when they speak of an infallible Bible one will usually reply with
something like: "Well, ONLY the original manuscripts were inspired and
they no longer exist, but through the labors of highly trained scholars
and godly men we have translations today which are accurate and
reliable...." That is, he does not have an infallible Bible, he only
has one that is (relatively) "accurate and reliable." In light of this,
how can he PROVE that ANY version (or the text behind it) is the best
when he admits his final authority no longer exists? Likewise, how can
he PROVE the King James Version (and its text) is not the best? He
cannot prove either. He has been pulled into Satan's "no perfect
translation" hoax and exalts his favorite scholar's opinion (or his
own) as his final authority even when it robs him of an inerrant Bible.
Did God allow the purity of His
word
to be destroyed with the original writings of Moses, David, Paul, etc.?
Did He only leave man defective texts and "reliable translations" that
are not perfect or inerrant? Does a person have to be a Greek and
Hebrew scholar before he can have the very words God wants him to have?
These and other questions we will try to answer in the following so the
Bible believer can give a good answer (1 Pet. 3:15) to those who attack
his precious Bible (KJV), and also so someone who may be confused about
the different translations can see reasons why he should believe the
Authorized King James Version of 1611 is the Bible God wants him to
have, use, and most of all, believe.
The
Basis Of This Book
The foundation of all true
Christian
doctrine must be the scriptures alone, so our contention that the
Authorized Version is inerrant must be based upon precepts and
principles found in them to be valid. These precepts and principles, we
maintain, are easily discovered by anyone who humbly reads the Bible
and believes what it says. The ONLY "textbook" the reader needs to
determine if the arguments we present in the following chapters are
both biblical and reasonable is the Bible itself. It should be his
ultimate authority. The reader could study extra-biblical material such
as manuscript evidence and become fully acquainted with the different
families of Greek manuscripts and their histories, but this is not
necessary to know the truth. The scriptures themselves, AS WE HAVE THEM
(KJV), claim to be the truth (John 17:17), and all a person has to do
to see if they are is OPEN THEM AND TRY THEM OUT (John 7:17)!
The study of manuscripts, however,
(not of the Bible itself) is the primary occupation of many scholars.
Some of them spend their entire adult life analyzing old parchments and
teaching Greek (and/or Hebrew) grammar, yet they still do not have a
perfect Bible. Their extensive education and great knowledge of Greek
texts has not given them an infallible Bible in ANY language.
Therefore, a believer should not be intimidated by the high-sounding
talk of some of them who say the King James Version is plagued with
errors. As stated before, when forced they will admit their final
authority on the subject no longer exists and is not available for
inspection. Thus, the reader should realize that such critical
statements are only opinion no matter how "scholarly" the person may
seem. Furthermore, about the only thing many of these Bible correctors
have in common is their contempt for the King James Version as the
standard English Bible.God's FINAL authority in English. They may
differ among themselves about what is the best Greek text for
translation and on how each word should be translated, but all will
agree that the Authorized Version contains many "unfortunate errors"
and needs "updating." One quickly learns when reading their material
that each one has his own idea of what text and translation is best;
this is why the English speaking world has over one hundred different
translations and no two read the same! With no final authority to
appeal to there can be as many Bibles as there are opinions!
Again, a Christian is not required
to
have a knowledge of the original languages or of manuscript evidence
before he can have the truth, and neither does he have to follow those
who do (or think they do). God never intended for any "elite" group of
Christians to have a monopoly on His word. The believer's faith is not
to be in man's "ability" to find and translate the right Greek text,
but in God's promise to PRESERVE His word and supply it to His
children! Therefore, we are not going to bore the reader with constant
appeals to ancient manuscripts which he has never heard of, nor are we
going to emphasis the opinions of scholars (of whatever persuasion) on
the way Greek and Hebrew words should be translated. God has warned the
believer not to trust in man or make flesh his arm (Jeremiah 17:5), so
in this study we are going to trust God that He has given us His word
(KJV) and believe what He has revealed to us in it.
In short, this book is written with
the firm belief that the King James Version is innocent until proven
guilty. No person has yet proven one error in it, and we believe no one
ever will. Edward F. Hills in his book, Believing Bible Study, states
on page 81:
When
we defend the King James Version, we do not place it on a level with
other English Bible versions and then try to find out which version has
the fewest mistakes. This would be to subjective. We must start out
rather with the objective fact that the King James Version is
preeminently the English Bible translation on which God has placed the
stamp of His approval. Hence the King James Version must be regarded as
correct unless it can be conclusively shown to be otherwise. Those who
assail it must be required to prove their point. By demonstrating that
they cannot do so we defend our historic English Bible.
Though
we do not agree with everything Dr. Hills says in this excellent book,
much of it we do agree with, and what he stated above expresses our
position exactly. We are not much concerned about what man in general
thinks of the King James Version, but we are very concerned about what
GOD thinks of it! It has now been more than 380 years since its arrival
into history in 1611, more than enough time to allow us to accurately
look back and see the attitude God has had towards it since then. A
very brief examination of its fruitful history should convince any
unbiased person that God's attitude towards it has been very favorable.
It is clearly the English Bible He has placed His stamp of approval on
at the expense of all others. In the following pages we will present
some of the virtues that account for its superiority.
Go
To Chapter II
|