|
The
Two Babylons
Chapter
IV
Doctrine
and Discipline
Section V
Purgatory and Prayers for
the Dead
"Extreme unction," however, to
a burdened soul, was but a miserable resource, after all, in the
prospect of death. No wonder, therefore, that something else was found
to be needed by those who had received all that priestly assumption
could pretend to confer, to comfort them in the prospect of eternity.
In every system, therefore, except that of the Bible, the doctrine of a
purgatory after death, and prayers for the dead, has always been found
to occupy a place. Go wherever we may, in ancient or modern times, we
shall find that Paganism leaves hope after death for sinners, who, at
the time of their departure, were consciously unfit for the abodes of
the blest. For this purpose a middle state has been feigned, in which,
by means of purgatorial pains, guilt unremoved in time may in a future
world be purged away, and the soul be made meet for final beatitude. In
Greece the doctrine of a purgatory was inculcated by the very chief of
the philosophers. Thus Plato, speaking of the future judgment of the
dead, holds out the hope of final deliverance for all,
but maintains that, of "those who are judged," "some" must
first "proceed to a subterranean place of judgment, where
they shall sustain the punishment they have deserved";
while others, in consequence of a favourable judgment, being elevated
at once into a certain celestial place, "shall pass their time in a
manner becoming the life they have lived in a human shape." In Pagan
Rome, purgatory was equally held up before the minds of men; but there,
there seems to have been no hope held out to any of exemption from its
pains. Therefore, Virgil, describing its different tortures, thus
speaks:
"Nor can
the grovelling mind,
In the dark dungeon of the limbs confined,
Assert the native skies, or own its heavenly kind.
Nor death itself can wholly wash their stains;
But long-contracted filth, even in the soul, remains
The relics of inveterate vice they wear,
And spots of sin obscene in every face appear.
For this are various penances enjoined;
And some are hung to bleach upon the wind,
Some plunged in water, others purged in fires,
Till all the dregs are drained, and all the rust expires. All have their Manes, and those Manes bear.
The few so cleansed to these abodes repair,
And breathe in ample fields the soft Elysian air,
Then are they happy, when by length of time
The scurf is worn away of each committed crime.
No speck is left of their habitual stains,
But the pure ether of the soul remains."
In Egypt, substantially the
same doctrine of purgatory was inculcated. But when once this doctrine
of purgatory was admitted into the popular mind, then the door was
opened for all manner of priestly extortions. Prayers for the dead ever
go hand in hand with purgatory; but no prayers can be completely
efficacious without the interposition of the priests; and no priestly
functions can be rendered unless there be special pay
for them. Therefore, in every land we find the Pagan priesthood
"devouring widows' houses," and making merchandise of the tender
feelings of sorrowing relatives, sensitively alive to the immortal
happiness of the beloved dead. From all quarters there is one universal
testimony as to the burdensome character and the expense
of these posthumous devotions. One of the oppressions under which the
poor Romanists in Ireland groan, is the periodical special devotions,
for which they are required to pay, when death has carried away one of
the inmates of their dwelling. Not only are there funeral services and
funeral dues for the repose of the departed, at the time of burial, but
the priest pays repeated visits to the family for the same purpose,
which entail heavy expense, beginning with what is called "the month's
mind," that is, a service in behalf of the deceased when a month after
death has elapsed. Something entirely similar to this had evidently
been the case in ancient Greece; for, says Muller in his History
of the Dorians, "the Argives sacrificed on the thirtieth day
[after death] to Mercury as the conductor of the dead." In India many
and burdensome are the services of the Sradd'ha, or funeral obsequies
for the repose of the dead; and for securing the due efficacy of these,
it is inculcated that "donations of cattle, land, gold, silver, and
other things," should be made by the man himself at the approach of
death; or, "if he be too weak, by another in his name" (Asiatic
Researches). Wherever we look, the case is nearly the same.
In Tartary, "The Gurjumi, or prayers for the dead," says the Asiatic
Journal, "are very expensive." In Greece, says Suidas, "the
greatest and most expensive sacrifice was the
mysterious sacrifice called the Telete," a sacrifice which, according
to Plato, "was offered for the living and the dead,
and was supposed to free them from all the evils to which the wicked
are liable when they have left this world." In Egypt the exactions of
the priests for funeral dues and masses for the dead were far from
being trifling. "The priests," says Wilkinson, "induced the people to
expend large sums on the celebration of funeral rites; and many
who had barely sufficient to obtain the necessaries of life
were anxious to save something for the expenses of their death. For,
beside the embalming process, which sometimes cost a talent of silver,
or about 250 pounds English money, the tomb itself was purchased at an
immense expense; and numerous demands were made upon the estate of the
deceased, for the celebration of prayer and other services for the
soul." "The ceremonies," we find him elsewhere saying, "consisted of a
sacrifice similar to those offered in the temples, vowed for the
deceased to one or more gods (as Osisris, Anubis, and others connected
with Amenti); incense and libation were also presented; and a prayer
was sometimes read, the relations and friends being present as
mourners. They even joined their prayers to those of the priest. The
priest who officiated at the burial service was selected from the grade
of Pontiffs, who wore the leopard skin; but various other rites were
performed by one of the minor priests to the mummies, previous to their
being lowered into the pit of the tomb after that ceremony. Indeed,
they continued to be administered at intervals, as long as
the family paid for their performance." Such was the
operation of the doctrine of purgatory and prayers for the dead among
avowed and acknowledged Pagans; and in what essential respect does it
differ from the operation of the same doctrine in Papal Rome? There are
the same extortions in the one as there were in the other. The doctrine
of purgatory is purely Pagan, and cannot for a moment stand in the
light of Scripture. For those who die in Christ no purgatory is,
or can be, needed; for "the blood of Jesus Christ,
God's Son, cleanseth from ALL sin." If this be true, where can there be
the need for any other cleansing? On the other hand, for those who die
without personal union to Christ, and consequently unwashed,
unjustified, unsaved, there can be no other cleansing; for, while "he
that hath the son hath life, he that hath not the Son hath not
life," and never can have it. Search the Scripture
through, and it will be found that, in regard to all who "die
in their sins," the decree of God is irreversible: "Let him
that is unjust be unjust still, and let him that is filthy be filthy
still." Thus the whole doctrine of purgatory is a system of pure
bare-faced Pagan imposture, dishonouring to God, deluding men who live
in sin with the hope of atoning for it after death, and cheating them
at once out of their property and their salvation. In the Pagan
purgatory, fire, water, wind, were represented (as may be seen from the
lines of Virgil) as combining to purge away the stain of sin. In the
purgatory of the Papacy, ever since the days of Pope Gregory, FIRE
itself has been the grand means of purgation (Catechismus
Romanus). Thus, while the purgatorial fires of the future
world are just the carrying out of the principle embodied in the
blazing and purifying Baal-fires of the eve of St. John, they form
another link in identifying the system of Rome with the system of
Tammuz or Zoroaster, the great God of the ancient fire-worshippers.
Now, if baptismal
regeneration, justification by works, penance as a satisfaction to
God's justice, the unbloody sacrifice of the mass, extreme unction,
purgatory, and prayers for the dead, were all derived from Babylon, how
justly may the general system of Rome be styled Babylonian?
And if the account already given be true, what thanks ought we to
render to God, that, from a system such as this, we were set free at
the blessed Reformation! How great a boon is it to be delivered from
trusting in such refuges of lies as could no more take away sin than
the blood of bulls or of goats! How blessed to feel that the blood of
the Lamb, applied by the Spirit of God to the most defiled conscience,
completely purges it from dead works and from sin! How fervent ought
our gratitude to be, when we know that, in all our trials and
distresses, we may come boldly unto the throne of grace, in the name of
no creature, but of God's eternal and well-beloved Son; and that that
Son is exhibited as a most tender and compassionate high priest, who is
TOUCHED with a feeling of our infirmities, having been in all points
tempted like as we are, yet without sin. Surely the thought of all
this, while inspiring tender compassion for the deluded slaves of Papal
tyranny, ought to make us ourselves stand fast in the liberty wherewith
Christ has made us free, and quit ourselves like men, that neither we
nor our children may ever again be entangled in the yoke of bondage.
The Two Babylons: Contents
|