|
The
Two Babylons
Chapter
IV
Doctrine
and Discipline
Section IV
Extreme Unction
The last office which Popery
performs for living men is to give them "extreme unction," to anoint
them in the name of the Lord, after they have been shriven and
absolved, and thus to prepare them for their last and unseen journey.
The pretence for this "unction" of dying men is professedly taken from
a command of James in regard to the visitation of the sick; but when
the passage in question is fairly quoted it will be seen that such a
practice could never have arisen from the apostolic direction--that it
must have come from an entirely different source. "Is any sick among
you?" says James (v 14,15), "let him call for the elders of the church;
and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the
Lord: and the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall
RAISE HIM UP." Now, it is evident that this prayer and anointing were
intended for the recovery of the sick. Apostolic
men, for the laying of the foundations of the Christian Church, were,
by their great King and Head, invested with miraculous powers--powers
which were intended only for a time, and were destined, as the apostles
themselves declared, while exercising them, to "vanish away" (1 Cor
13:8). These powers were every day exercised by the "elders of the
Church," when James wrote his epistle, and that for healing
the bodies of men, even as our Lord Himself did. The "extreme unction"
of Rome, as the very expression itself declares, is not
intended for any such purpose. It is not intended for healing the sick,
or "raising them up"; for it is not
on any account to be administered till all hope of recovery
is gone, and death is visibly at the very doors. As the object of this
anointing is the very opposite of the Scriptural anointing, it must
have come from a quite different quarter. That quarter is the very same
from which the Papacy has imported so much heathenism, as we have seen
already, into its own foul bosom. From the Chaldean Mysteries, extreme
unction has obviously come. Among the many names of the Babylonian god
was the name "Beel-samen," "Lord of Heaven," which is the name of the
sun, but also of course of the sun-god. But Beel-samen also properly
signifies "Lord of Oil," and was evidently intended as a synonym of the
Divine name, "The Messiah." In Herodotus we find a statement made which
this name alone can fully explain. There an individual is represented
as having dreamt that the sun had anointed her father. That the sun
should anoint any one is certainly not an idea that could naturally
have presented itself; but when the name "Beel-samen," "Lord of
Heaven," is seen also to signify "Lord of Oil," it is easy to see how
that idea would be suggested. This also accounts for the fact that the
body of the Babylonian Belus was represented as having been preserved
in his sepulchre in Babylon till the time of Xerxes, floating in oil
(CLERICUS, Philosoph. Orient.). And for the same
reason, no doubt, it was that at Rome the "statue of Saturn" was "made
hollow, and filled with oil" (SMITH'S Classical
Dictionary).
The olive branch, which we
have already seen to have been one of the symbols of the Chaldean god,
had evidently the same hieroglyphical meaning; for, as the olive was
the oil-tree, so an olive branch emblematically signified a "son of
oil," or an "anointed one" (Zech 4:12-14). Hence the reason that the
Greeks, in coming before their gods in the attitude of suppliants
deprecating their wrath and entreating their favour, came to the temple
on many occasions bearing an olive branch in their hands. As the olive
branch was one of the recognised symbols of their Messiah, whose great
mission it was to make peace between God and man, so, in bearing this
branch of the anointed one, they thereby testified that in the name
of that anointed one they came seeking peace. Now, the worshippers of
this Beel-samen, "Lord of Heaven," and "Lord of Oil," were anointed in
the name of their god. It was not enough that they were anointed with
"spittle"; they were also anointed with "magical ointments" of the most
powerful kind; and these ointments were the means of introducing into
their bodily systems such drugs as tended to excite their imaginations
and add to the power of the magical drinks they received, that they
might be prepared for the visions and revelations that were to be made
to them in the Mysteries. These "unctions," says
Salverte, "were exceedingly frequent in the ancient ceremonies...Before
consulting the oracle of Trophonius, they were rubbed with oil over the
whole body. This preparation certainly concurred to produce the desired
vision. Before being admitted to the Mysteries of the Indian sages,
Apollonius and his companion were rubbed with an oil so powerful that they
felt as if bathed with fire." This was professedly an unction
in the name of the "Lord of Heaven," to fit and prepare them for being
admitted in vision into his awful presence. The
very same reason that suggested such an unction before initiation on
this present scene of things, would naturally plead more powerfully
still for a special "unction" when the individual
was called, not in vision, but in reality, to face the "Mystery of
mysteries," his personal introduction into the world unseen and
eternal. Thus the Pagan system naturally developed itself into "extreme
unction" (Quarterly Journal of Prophecy, January,
1853). Its votaries were anointed for their last
journey, that by the double influence of superstition and powerful
stimulants introduced into the frame by the only way in which it might
then be possible, their minds might be fortified at once against the
sense of guilt and the assaults of the king of terrors. From this
source, and this alone, there can be no doubt came the "extreme
unction" of the Papacy, which was entirely unknown among Christians
till corruption was far advanced in the Church. *
* Bishop GIBSON says that it
was not known in the Church for a thousand years. (Preservative
against Popery)
The Two Babylons: Contents
|